Clicky

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL500

Portability
54
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front
 
Samsung TL500 front
Portability
88
Imaging
34
Features
54
Overall
42

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs

FujiFilm S200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
  • 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Alternate Name is FinePix S205EXR
Samsung TL500
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
  • 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
  • Launched July 2010
  • Alternate Name is EX1
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL500 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL500, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S200EXR (12MP) and the TL500 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the S200EXR (1/1.6") and TL500 (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizes.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The S200EXR was released 11 months before the TL500 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL500 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the S200EXR matches up against the TL500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung TL500

 S200EXR TL500 

Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the FujiFilm S200EXR

 TL500 S200EXR 
LaunchedJuly 2010July 2009Fresher by 11 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution614k230kClearer screen (+384k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung TL500

 S200EXR TL500 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S200EXR has got physical dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") along with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).

Contrast the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the S200EXR against the TL500.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL500 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S200EXR and TL500 is 54 and 88 respectively.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing merely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200EXR and TL500.

As you can see, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The S200EXR due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the FujiFilm S200EXR will show extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older S200EXR will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with FujiFilm S200EXR
Portrait photography with Samsung TL500
45
focusing manually
offers face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.6")
40
focusing manually
saves RAW files
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR as a Street photography camera
Samsung TL500 as a Street photography camera
45
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/1.6")
heavier than others (865 grams)
66
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
heavier than competition (386 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Sports photography factors
Samsung TL500 Sports photography factors
34
excellent zoom range (31-436mm 14.1 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/1.6")
does not have phase detect AF
29
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Travel photography information
Samsung TL500 Travel photography information
38
has built in flash
great zoom (436mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (865 grams)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
64
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
pretty wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (386g)
low MP (10MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Landscape photography advice
Samsung TL500 Landscape photography advice
34
focusing manually
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/1.6")
does not have Time Lapse recording
52
focusing manually
pretty wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
no Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR Vlogging highlights
Samsung TL500 Vlogging highlights
19
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
wide angle not great (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic port
heavier than others (865g)
64
pretty wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
no external mic jack
heavier than competition (386 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung TL500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung TL500
 FujiFilm FinePix S200EXRSamsung TL500
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Samsung
Model FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR Samsung TL500
Also Known as FinePix S205EXR EX1
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Released 2009-07-22 2010-07-09
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Chip EXR -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 8 x 6mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 48.0mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Highest boosted ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 31-436mm (14.1x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.3 f/1.8-2.4
Macro focus range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 4.5 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 614k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.20 m 5.20 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 865 grams (1.91 pounds) 386 grams (0.85 pounds)
Physical dimensions 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 40
DXO Color Depth score not tested 19.2
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.1
DXO Low light score not tested 129
Other
Battery model NP-140 SLB-07A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC Internal SD/SDHC, internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $500 $527