FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB1100F
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Released July 2009
- Also referred to as FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Launched January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Below, we are comparing the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung WB1100F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and WB1100F (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and WB1100F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S200EXR was brought out 5 years earlier than the WB1100F and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the S200EXR grades against the WB1100F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Samsung WB1100F. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung WB1100F
| S200EXR | WB1100F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| WB1100F | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 54 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung WB1100F
| S200EXR | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you have to factor its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S200EXR has got physical dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") along with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB1100F has sizing of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") accompanied by a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung WB1100F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the S200EXR vs the WB1100F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S200EXR and WB1100F is 54 and 67 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The visual below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200EXR and WB1100F.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The S200EXR featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung WB1100F will produce greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The older S200EXR will be behind in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung WB1100F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung WB1100F |
| Also called as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.20 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 865 gr (1.91 pounds) | 512 gr (1.13 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-140 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $500 | $250 |