FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB350F
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also Known as FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and WB350F (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S200EXR was brought out 5 years earlier than the WB350F which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the S200EXR grades versus the WB350F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung WB350F
S200EXR | WB350F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the FujiFilm S200EXR
WB350F | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | July 2009 | Newer by 54 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung WB350F
S200EXR | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The FujiFilm S200EXR comes with exterior measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has specifications of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung WB350F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the S200EXR against the WB350F.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and WB350F is 54 and 90 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The pic underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the S200EXR and WB350F.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S200EXR because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB350F will offer greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged S200EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung WB350F |
Also referred to as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 865g (1.91 lb) | 276g (0.61 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-140 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $500 | $260 |