FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB35F
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Let's look much closer at the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and WB35F (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe S200EXR was announced 5 years earlier than the WB35F and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the S200EXR scores vs the WB35F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung WB35F
| S200EXR | WB35F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| WB35F | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 54 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung WB35F
| S200EXR | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S200EXR offers exterior dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") having a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the S200EXR vs the WB35F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and WB35F is 54 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing technical specs. The photograph below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the S200EXR and WB35F.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The S200EXR with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung WB35F will provide greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older S200EXR will be behind in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung WB35F |
| Also called as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 865 gr (1.91 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-140 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $500 | $130 |
