FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB50F
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung WB50F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and WB50F (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S200EXR was unveiled 5 years prior to the WB50F which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the S200EXR grades vs the WB50F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Samsung WB50F. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung WB50F
| S200EXR | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| WB50F | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 54 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung WB50F
| S200EXR | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and size. The FujiFilm S200EXR provides physical dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") having a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the S200EXR compared to the WB50F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S200EXR and WB50F is 54 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specifications. The pic below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200EXR and WB50F.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The S200EXR having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB50F will render extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged S200EXR will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung WB50F |
| Also Known as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 865 gr (1.91 lb) | 207 gr (0.46 lb) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-140 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $500 | $180 |