FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB800F
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here, we will be comparing the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and WB800F (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S200EXR was manufactured 4 years before the WB800F and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the S200EXR scores against the WB800F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR and Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Samsung WB800F
S200EXR | WB800F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the FujiFilm S200EXR
WB800F | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | July 2009 | Fresher by 42 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Samsung WB800F
S200EXR | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and size. The FujiFilm S200EXR has exterior dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB800F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the S200EXR vs the WB800F.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the S200EXR and WB800F is 54 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The visual here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200EXR and WB800F.
All in all, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S200EXR due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung WB800F will offer you extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The older S200EXR is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Samsung WB800F |
Otherwise known as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 865g (1.91 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-140 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $500 | $300 |