FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma SD9
54 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also referred to as FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma SD9 Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the FujiFilm S200EXR and Sigma SD9, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals FujiFilm and Sigma. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and SD9 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S200EXR was unveiled 6 years after the SD9 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the S200EXR grades versus the SD9 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Sigma SD9. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Sigma SD9
| S200EXR | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2009 | November 2002 | Newer by 81 months | |
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 130k | Crisper display (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| SD9 | S200EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Sigma SD9
| S200EXR | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The FujiFilm S200EXR has outside dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm S200EXR and Sigma SD9 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the S200EXR versus the SD9.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S200EXR and SD9 is 54 and 54 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by going through a spec sheet. The picture underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S200EXR and SD9.
Clearly, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S200EXR with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the FujiFilm S200EXR will show greater detail having an extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent S200EXR should have an edge in sensor tech.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Sigma |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Sigma SD9 |
| Also called as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2002-11-26 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 1.8 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 130k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 865 grams (1.91 pounds) | 950 grams (2.09 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-140 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $500 | $3,001 |