FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sony WX300
54 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
94 Imaging
41 Features
38 Overall
39
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sony WX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
- Revealed February 2013
- New Model is Sony WX350
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sony WX300 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Sony WX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and WX300 (18MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and WX300 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S200EXR was introduced 4 years before the WX300 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony WX300 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the S200EXR scores against the WX300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sony WX300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery and Sony WX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Sony WX300
| S200EXR | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| WX300 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2013 | July 2009 | Fresher by 43 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Sony WX300
| S200EXR | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S200EXR enjoys outer measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") along with a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) while the Sony WX300 has proportions of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm S200EXR versus Sony WX300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the S200EXR vs the WX300.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and WX300 is 54 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the S200EXR and WX300.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The S200EXR with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony WX300 will offer more detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older S200EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sony WX300 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 |
| Also called as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2013-02-20 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/3.5-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m | 4.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 865 grams (1.91 lbs) | 166 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-140 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $500 | $330 |