FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
78 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33


90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 337g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix S2600HD
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Updated by Ricoh WG-6

FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Below, we will be comparing the FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the S2500HD (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The S2500HD was unveiled 5 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S2500HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the S2500HD grades versus the WG-5 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S2500HD Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2500HD over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
S2500HD | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the FujiFilm S2500HD
WG-5 GPS | S2500HD | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 56 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2500HD and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
S2500HD | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S2500HD has outer dimensions of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 337 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the S2500HD versus the WG-5 GPS.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the S2500HD and WG-5 GPS is 78 and 90 respectively.

FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specs. The image below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S2500HD and WG-5 GPS.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to offer more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged S2500HD is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Alternate name | FinePix S2600HD | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 99% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 14.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.40 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 337 grams (0.74 lb) | 236 grams (0.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $200 | $500 |