FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-M1
78 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 337g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Additionally referred to as FinePix S2600HD
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Lets look much closer at the FujiFilm S2500HD and Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the S2500HD (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe S2500HD was released 5 years prior to the WG-M1 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S2500HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the S2500HD grades vs the WG-M1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are provided at FujiFilm S2500HD Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2500HD over the Ricoh WG-M1
| S2500HD | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the FujiFilm S2500HD
| WG-M1 | S2500HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 | July 2010 | Fresher by 50 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2500HD and Ricoh WG-M1
| S2500HD | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S2500HD offers outside dimensions of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") having a weight of 337 grams (0.74 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm S2500HD and Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the S2500HD against the WG-M1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the S2500HD and WG-M1 is 78 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the S2500HD and WG-M1.
Clearly, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to render greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older S2500HD will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm S2500HD vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Also Known as | FinePix S2600HD | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 99 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 337g (0.74 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $200 | $2,000 |