FujiFilm S2500HD vs Samsung CL80
78 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
FujiFilm S2500HD vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 337g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Other Name is FinePix S2600HD
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Other Name is ST5500
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm S2500HD vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the FujiFilm S2500HD and Samsung CL80, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S2500HD (12MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S2500HD was revealed 7 months later than the CL80 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S2500HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the S2500HD scores versus the CL80 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm S2500HD vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD and Samsung CL80. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm S2500HD Gallery and Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2500HD over the Samsung CL80
| S2500HD | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the FujiFilm S2500HD
| CL80 | S2500HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.7" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2500HD and Samsung CL80
| S2500HD | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
FujiFilm S2500HD vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S2500HD has got outer measurements of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") having a weight of 337 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL80 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm S2500HD and Samsung CL80 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the S2500HD versus the CL80.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the S2500HD and CL80 is 78 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm S2500HD vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the S2500HD and CL80.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Samsung CL80 to show extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern S2500HD will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm S2500HD vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
FujiFilm S2500HD vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD | Samsung CL80 |
| Also called | FinePix S2600HD | ST5500 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 99 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 337g (0.74 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $200 | $400 |