FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
75 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Also referred to as FinePix S2900HD
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Successor is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Photography Glossary FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the S2800HD (14MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S2800HD was brought out very close to the SP-800 UZ which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the S2800HD scores vs the SP-800 UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| S2800HD | SP-800 UZ |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the FujiFilm S2800HD
| SP-800 UZ | S2800HD |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm S2800HD and Olympus SP-800 UZ
| S2800HD | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2010 |  | February 2010 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S2800HD has exterior dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") with a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-800 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SP-800 UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the S2800HD compared to the SP-800 UZ.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S2800HD and SP-800 UZ is 75 and 69 respectively.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The image underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S2800HD and SP-800 UZ.
As you can tell, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures however you would want to factor the launch date of the cameras into account.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
| Also Known as | FinePix S2900HD | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 99 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 12 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 437 gr (0.96 pounds) | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $260 | $270 |