FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung HZ35W
75 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternative Name is FinePix S2900HD
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below, we are contrasting the FujiFilm S2800HD versus Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S2800HD (14MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly similar and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S2800HD was revealed 4 months prior to the HZ35W so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the S2800HD scores against the HZ35W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD & Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Samsung HZ35W
| S2800HD | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the FujiFilm S2800HD
| HZ35W | S2800HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2800HD and Samsung HZ35W
| S2800HD | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2010 |  | June 2010 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S2800HD has external measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") along with a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm S2800HD versus Samsung HZ35W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the S2800HD vs the HZ35W.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S2800HD and HZ35W is 75 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specs. The photograph here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the S2800HD and HZ35W.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the FujiFilm S2800HD to offer you more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos much more aggressively.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Samsung HZ35W |
| Alternative name | FinePix S2900HD | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 99% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 437g (0.96 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $260 | $300 |
