FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung ST65
75 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Also referred to as FinePix S2900HD
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung ST65 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the FujiFilm S2800HD versus Samsung ST65, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S2800HD (14MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S2800HD was announced 11 months before the ST65 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the S2800HD matches up against the ST65 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD & Samsung ST65. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Samsung ST65
| S2800HD | ST65 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the FujiFilm S2800HD
| ST65 | S2800HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 11 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2800HD and Samsung ST65
| S2800HD | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S2800HD comes with outer dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") with a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm S2800HD versus Samsung ST65 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the S2800HD against the ST65.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the S2800HD and ST65 is 75 and 99 respectively.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S2800HD and ST65.
Plainly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution and you can expect similar quality of photos but you really should consider the age of the products into consideration. The older S2800HD is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Samsung ST65 |
| Also referred to as | FinePix S2900HD | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 99% | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 437 grams (0.96 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $260 | $130 |