FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210
75 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
![FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD front FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-S2800HD/FujiFilm-S2800HD-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB210 front Samsung WB210 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB210/Samsung-WB210-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Released February 2010
- Additionally Known as FinePix S2900HD
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the FujiFilm S2800HD versus Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the S2800HD (14MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The S2800HD was introduced 17 months prior to the WB210 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the S2800HD matches up vs the WB210 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD & Samsung WB210. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Samsung WB210
S2800HD | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 1k | Clearer screen (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the FujiFilm S2800HD
WB210 | S2800HD | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 17 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2800HD and Samsung WB210
S2800HD | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S2800HD features outer measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") and a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm S2800HD versus Samsung WB210 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the S2800HD and the WB210.
![FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210 size comparison FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S2800HD-vs-Samsung-WB210-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S2800HD and WB210 is 75 and 94 respectively.
![FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S2800HD-vs-Samsung-WB210-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the S2800HD and WB210.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures but you will want to take the age of the products into consideration. The older S2800HD is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
![FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210 sensor size comparison FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S2800HD-vs-Samsung-WB210-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-S2800HD-vs-Samsung-WB210-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Samsung WB210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Samsung WB210 |
Also referred to as | FinePix S2900HD | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 99% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.40 m | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 437g (0.96 pounds) | 174g (0.38 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $260 | $279 |