FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB35F
75 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Announced February 2010
- Additionally Known as FinePix S2900HD
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Photography Glossary FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S2800HD (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S2800HD was announced 4 years prior to the WB35F which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the S2800HD grades vs the WB35F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD and Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Samsung WB35F
| S2800HD | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the FujiFilm S2800HD
| WB35F | S2800HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 | February 2010 | Newer by 47 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2800HD and Samsung WB35F
| S2800HD | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S2800HD has external dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") along with a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the S2800HD vs the WB35F.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the S2800HD and WB35F is 75 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by going through technical specs. The image below might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the S2800HD and WB35F.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung WB35F to provide greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged S2800HD will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Samsung WB35F |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix S2900HD | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 99 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 437 grams (0.96 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $260 | $130 |