FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB800F
75 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally Known as FinePix S2900HD
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Photography Glossary FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB800F Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the S2800HD (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is pretty similar and they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S2800HD was launched 3 years prior to the WB800F which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the S2800HD scores vs the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD and Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are available at FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Samsung WB800F
| S2800HD | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the FujiFilm S2800HD
| WB800F | S2800HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 35 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2800HD and Samsung WB800F
| S2800HD | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S2800HD offers exterior measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB800F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the S2800HD versus the WB800F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the S2800HD and WB800F is 75 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading a spec sheet. The picture below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the S2800HD and WB800F.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB800F to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged S2800HD is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Samsung WB800F |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix S2900HD | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 99% | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 437 grams (0.96 lbs) | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $260 | $300 |