FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung HZ35W
76 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Launched January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix S2990
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S2950 (14MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S2950 was manufactured 7 months later than the HZ35W and they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S2950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the S2950 scores versus the HZ35W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S2950 and Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm S2950 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2950 over the Samsung HZ35W
| S2950 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the FujiFilm S2950
| HZ35W | S2950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2950 and Samsung HZ35W
| S2950 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The FujiFilm S2950 enjoys outside dimensions of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") with a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the S2950 versus the HZ35W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the S2950 and HZ35W is 76 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The graphic below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S2950 and HZ35W.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the FujiFilm S2950 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern S2950 should have an edge in sensor tech.
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called as | FinePix S2990 | WB650 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 437g (0.96 lbs) | 245g (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Battery format | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $330 | $300 |