FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL102
76 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Released January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix S2990
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the FujiFilm S2950 versus Samsung SL102, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the S2950 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S2950 was manufactured 2 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm S2950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the S2950 scores vs the SL102 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix S2950 and Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm S2950 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2950 over the Samsung SL102
| S2950 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the FujiFilm S2950
| SL102 | S2950 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm S2950 and Samsung SL102
| S2950 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S2950 provides physical measurements of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") with a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the FujiFilm S2950 versus Samsung SL102 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the S2950 versus the SL102.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the S2950 and SL102 is 76 and 96 respectively.
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing merely by viewing specifications. The graphic here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the S2950 and SL102.
To sum up, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the FujiFilm S2950 to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern S2950 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | FinePix S2990 | ES55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 437g (0.96 pounds) | 116g (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery format | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $330 | $130 |