FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL202
76 Imaging
36 Features
39 Overall
37
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Released January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix S2990
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also Known as PL50
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's look much closer at the FujiFilm S2950 versus Samsung SL202, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the S2950 (14MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S2950 was introduced 23 months later than the SL202 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm S2950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the S2950 matches up versus the SL202 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S2950 & Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm S2950 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2950 over the Samsung SL202
| S2950 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | February 2009 | Fresher by 23 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the FujiFilm S2950
| SL202 | S2950 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm S2950 and Samsung SL202
| S2950 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm S2950 enjoys external measurements of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") having a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm S2950 versus Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the S2950 and the SL202.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S2950 and SL202 is 76 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the S2950 and SL202.
As you can see, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the FujiFilm S2950 to offer you extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The fresher S2950 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | Samsung SL202 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix S2990 | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 437 gr (0.96 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Type of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $330 | $140 |