FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung ST600
76 Imaging
36 Features
39 Overall
37
95 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung ST600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Launched January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix S2990
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 150g - 104 x 60 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung ST600 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung ST600, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S2950 (14MP) and the ST600 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S2950 was announced 13 months later than the ST600 making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm S2950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST600 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the S2950 matches up versus the ST600 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung ST600 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S2950 & Samsung ST600. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm S2950 Gallery & Samsung ST600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2950 over the Samsung ST600
| S2950 | ST600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST600 over the FujiFilm S2950
| ST600 | S2950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+922k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2950 and Samsung ST600
| S2950 | ST600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung ST600 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S2950 has outside dimensions of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") having a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Samsung ST600 has proportions of 104mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung ST600 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the S2950 versus the ST600.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S2950 and ST600 is 76 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung ST600 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing specifications. The graphic underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S2950 and ST600.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of files but you may want to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more modern S2950 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung ST600 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung ST600 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | Samsung ST600 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | Samsung ST600 |
| Also called as | FinePix S2990 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 437 grams (0.96 lb) | 150 grams (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 104 x 60 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery type | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB07 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $330 | $330 |