FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F
76 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33743/337434d0283f067c28fe934446d977133d7ca5d2" alt="FujiFilm FinePix S2950 front FujiFilm FinePix S2950 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/999d5/999d5267cbeeded12e1c296ab2c2e623b4be3f06" alt="Samsung WB150F front Samsung WB150F front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix S2990
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Below, we are looking at the FujiFilm S2950 versus Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the S2950 (14MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is fairly comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The S2950 was manufactured 12 months before the WB150F and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S2950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the S2950 scores against the WB150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix S2950 & Samsung WB150F. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S2950 Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2950 over the Samsung WB150F
S2950 | WB150F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the FujiFilm S2950
WB150F | S2950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 12 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2950 and Samsung WB150F
S2950 | WB150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S2950 features external dimensions of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") with a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm S2950 versus Samsung WB150F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the S2950 against the WB150F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/951f6/951f6d0acf88d3f37d573ce01d8c36680ef8e29e" alt="FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S2950 and WB150F is 76 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9233/c9233423a08e0bd64453da610ffd97eefda01c0b" alt="FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The pic here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S2950 and WB150F.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP and you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you will need to factor the age of the cameras into account. The more aged S2950 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1100/c110058e725618534048d1884ba5f8e4152c38d5" alt="FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81370/81370e5a4769077cdab203a2fc0145422ea9fb29" alt="FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
FujiFilm S2950 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | Samsung WB150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | Samsung WB150F |
Alternative name | FinePix S2990 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 437 grams (0.96 lbs) | 188 grams (0.41 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Style of battery | AA | - |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $330 | $230 |