FujiFilm S3200 vs Fujifilm JV150
67 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
96 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
FujiFilm S3200 vs Fujifilm JV150 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix S3250
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 37-111mm (F3.2-4.3) lens
- 126g - 93 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced February 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm S3200 vs Fujifilm JV150 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the FujiFilm S3200 versus Fujifilm JV150, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the S3200 (14MP) and the Fujifilm JV150 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S3200 was revealed 12 months after the Fujifilm JV150 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S3200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Fujifilm JV150 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the S3200 scores against the Fujifilm JV150 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm S3200 vs Fujifilm JV150 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S3200 & Fujifilm FinePix JV150. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm S3200 Gallery & Fujifilm JV150 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Fujifilm JV150
| S3200 | Fujifilm JV150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 | February 2010 | Newer by 12 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JV150 over the FujiFilm S3200
| Fujifilm JV150 | S3200 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm S3200 and Fujifilm JV150
| S3200 | Fujifilm JV150 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S3200 vs Fujifilm JV150 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S3200 offers exterior dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) while the Fujifilm JV150 has sizing of 93mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm S3200 versus Fujifilm JV150 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the S3200 against the Fujifilm JV150.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S3200 and Fujifilm JV150 is 67 and 96 respectively.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Fujifilm JV150 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out a spec sheet. The picture underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S3200 and Fujifilm JV150.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of images although you really should factor the age of the cameras into account. The newer S3200 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Fujifilm JV150 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm S3200 vs Fujifilm JV150 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Fujifilm FinePix JV150 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Fujifilm FinePix JV150 |
| Also called as | FinePix S3250 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 37-111mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.2-4.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540g (1.19 lbs) | 126g (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 93 x 55 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $190 | $0 |