FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh CX3
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix S3250
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the FujiFilm S3200 and Ricoh CX3, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the S3200 (14MP) and CX3 (10MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S3200 was revealed 7 months after the CX3 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm S3200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the S3200 matches up against the CX3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S3200 & Ricoh CX3. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm S3200 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Ricoh CX3
| S3200 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the FujiFilm S3200
| CX3 | S3200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S3200 and Ricoh CX3
| S3200 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The FujiFilm S3200 comes with outside dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the FujiFilm S3200 and Ricoh CX3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the S3200 vs the CX3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S3200 and CX3 is 67 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specifications. The image below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S3200 and CX3.
To sum up, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the FujiFilm S3200 to render greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The fresher S3200 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm S3200 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Also called | FinePix S3250 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540g (1.19 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $190 | $329 |