FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL620
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix S3250
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Other Name is PL65
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the FujiFilm S3200 and Samsung SL620, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S3200 (14MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe S3200 was introduced 23 months after the SL620 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm S3200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the S3200 matches up versus the SL620 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S3200 & Samsung SL620. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S3200 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Samsung SL620
| S3200 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 23 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the FujiFilm S3200
| SL620 | S3200 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm S3200 and Samsung SL620
| S3200 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S3200 has got external dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm S3200 and Samsung SL620 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the S3200 vs the SL620.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the S3200 and SL620 is 67 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing specs. The picture here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the S3200 and SL620.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the FujiFilm S3200 to result in greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger S3200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Samsung SL620 |
| Alternate name | FinePix S3250 | PL65 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540 gr (1.19 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $190 | $200 |