FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung ST95
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix S3250
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Let's look more closely at the FujiFilm S3200 versus Samsung ST95, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the S3200 (14MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S3200 was introduced around the same time to the ST95 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S3200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the S3200 scores vs the ST95 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S3200 & Samsung ST95. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S3200 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Samsung ST95
| S3200 | ST95 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the FujiFilm S3200
| ST95 | S3200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S3200 and Samsung ST95
| S3200 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | January 2011 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S3200 offers exterior dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the FujiFilm S3200 versus Samsung ST95 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the S3200 and the ST95.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S3200 and ST95 is 67 and 99 respectively.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S3200 and ST95.
As you can see, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung ST95 to give extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Samsung ST95 |
| Also called as | FinePix S3250 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540 grams (1.19 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery form | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $190 | $145 |