FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB2200F
Portability
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Portability
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
FujiFilm S3200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix S3250
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Announced January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Following is a in depth review of the FujiFilm S3200 versus Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the S3200 (14MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe S3200 was launched 4 years prior to the WB2200F which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the S3200 grades vs the WB2200F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix S3200 & Samsung WB2200F. The complete galleries are provided at FujiFilm S3200 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Samsung WB2200F
| S3200 | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the FujiFilm S3200
| WB2200F | S3200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 36 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S3200 and Samsung WB2200F
| S3200 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S3200 features outside dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has sizing of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") and a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
See the FujiFilm S3200 versus Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the S3200 and the WB2200F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S3200 and WB2200F is 67 and 59 respectively.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by reading a spec sheet. The image here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S3200 and WB2200F.
As you can see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB2200F to offer more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged S3200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm S3200 Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB2200F Portrait photography factors
decent MP (14 megapixels)
supports face detection focusing
no manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
you can focus manually
good resolution (16MP)
includes face detect autofocus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
FujiFilm S3200 Street photography details
Samsung WB2200F Street photography details
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
heavier than competition in class (540g)
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than average in class (708g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sports photography with FujiFilm S3200
Sports photography with Samsung WB2200F
great zoom range (24-576mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
long zoom range (20-1200mm 60.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
includes tracking focus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
FujiFilm S3200 Travel photography details
Samsung WB2200F Travel photography details
decent MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (576mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (540g)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (20mm)
great reach (1200mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (708g)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm S3200 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB2200F Landscape photography factors
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
you can focus manually
quite wide (20mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm S3200 Vlogging information
Samsung WB2200F Vlogging information
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic support
heavier than competition in class (540g)
quite wide (20mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
missing mic port
heavier than average in class (708g)
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix S3250 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540 gr (1.19 pounds) | 708 gr (1.56 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Battery form | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $190 | $599 |