FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB35F
67 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix S3250
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Below is a extensive review of the FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the S3200 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S3200 was introduced 4 years earlier than the WB35F and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S3200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the S3200 matches up against the WB35F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S3200 and Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S3200 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Samsung WB35F
| S3200 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the FujiFilm S3200
| WB35F | S3200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 36 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the FujiFilm S3200 and Samsung WB35F
| S3200 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S3200 features outside measurements of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") and a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB35F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the S3200 compared to the WB35F.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the S3200 and WB35F is 67 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S3200 and WB35F.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB35F to offer more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The older S3200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Samsung WB35F |
| Also referred to as | FinePix S3250 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540g (1.19 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery form | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $190 | $130 |