FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB700
67 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix S3250
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Released December 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the FujiFilm S3200 and Samsung WB700, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the S3200 (14MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is relatively similar and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe S3200 was brought out about the same time to the WB700 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S3200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the S3200 scores vs the WB700 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S3200 & Samsung WB700. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm S3200 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Samsung WB700
| S3200 | WB700 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the FujiFilm S3200
| WB700 | S3200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S3200 and Samsung WB700
| S3200 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | December 2010 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S3200 features exterior measurements of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") along with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm S3200 and Samsung WB700 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the S3200 against the WB700.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S3200 and WB700 is 67 and 98 respectively.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over specifications. The pic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the S3200 and WB700.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of images however you should really take the age of the products into consideration.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Samsung WB700 |
| Also Known as | FinePix S3250 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 540 gr (1.19 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Battery form | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $190 | $300 |