FujiFilm S3200 vs Sony H400
Portability
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Portability
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
FujiFilm S3200 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
FujiFilm S3200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix S3250
Sony H400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Launched February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm S3200 vs Sony H400 Overview
Let's look much closer at the FujiFilm S3200 versus Sony H400, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Sony. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the S3200 (14MP) and H400 (20MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S3200 was unveiled 4 years before the H400 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the S3200 matches up against the H400 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm S3200 vs Sony H400 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S3200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm S3200 Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Sony H400
| S3200 | H400 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the FujiFilm S3200
| H400 | S3200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 37 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S3200 and Sony H400
| S3200 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
FujiFilm S3200 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S3200 offers exterior dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") along with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) while the Sony H400 has sizing of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") having a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
See the FujiFilm S3200 versus Sony H400 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the S3200 versus the H400.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S3200 and H400 is 67 and 62 respectively.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through technical specs. The photograph here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S3200 and H400.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Sony H400 to render more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The older S3200 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm S3200 Portrait photography advice
Sony H400 Portrait photography advice
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
MP count decent (20MP)
provides face detect focus
no manual focus
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
FujiFilm S3200 Street photography details
Sony H400 Street photography details
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than competitors (540 grams)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competitors (628 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sports photography with FujiFilm S3200
Sports photography with Sony H400
great zoom range (24-576mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
slow fps (1.0 fps)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (25-1550mm 62.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
provides tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Travel photography with FujiFilm S3200
Travel photography with Sony H400
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (576mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors (540 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
MP count decent (20MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
great reach (1550mm)
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors (628 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm S3200 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony H400 as a Landscape photography camera
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
rather wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm S3200 Vlogging features
Sony H400 Vlogging features
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic port
heavier than competitors (540g)
rather wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
does have microphone socket
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
more heavy than competitors (628 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm S3200 vs Sony H400 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix S3250 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 8.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 X 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540g (1.19 lb) | 628g (1.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Style of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $190 | $268 |