FujiFilm S4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1
67 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
FujiFilm S4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Announced January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix S4050
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm S4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the FujiFilm S4000 and Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the S4000 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S4000 was brought out 4 years prior to the WG-M1 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S4000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the S4000 grades vs the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm S4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S4000 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm S4000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S4000 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| S4000 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+345k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the FujiFilm S4000
| WG-M1 | S4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 44 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm S4000 and Ricoh WG-M1
| S4000 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm S4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The FujiFilm S4000 enjoys outside dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm S4000 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the S4000 versus the WG-M1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S4000 and WG-M1 is 67 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm S4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specs. The pic below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S4000 and WG-M1.
All in all, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same MP therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures however you would want to consider the age of the products into consideration. The more aged S4000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm S4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm S4000 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S4000 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S4000 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Also called | FinePix S4050 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 540 grams (1.19 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 350 photos |
| Battery form | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $279 | $2,000 |