FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df17/5df179454dc2319a03c09c85a04106486194b882" alt="FujiFilm FinePix S4000 front FujiFilm FinePix S4000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9341/e93412f40c7362d3e09ff5f3d2f972e609f5d64d" alt="Samsung SL202 front Samsung SL202 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Launched January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix S4050
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below, we are comparing the FujiFilm S4000 versus Samsung SL202, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the S4000 (14MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The S4000 was revealed 23 months after the SL202 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S4000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the S4000 grades against the SL202 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S4000 & Samsung SL202. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm S4000 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S4000 over the Samsung SL202
S4000 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | February 2009 | More modern by 23 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the FujiFilm S4000
SL202 | S4000 |
---|
Common features in the FujiFilm S4000 and Samsung SL202
S4000 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm S4000 features exterior measurements of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm S4000 versus Samsung SL202 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the S4000 and the SL202.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/611ec/611ecf9b150a0a7e7100c6db60364432646bcdef" alt="FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the S4000 and SL202 is 67 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fea60/fea60427c5896d79d1499a877c0ca463fb307798" alt="FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out specifications. The pic below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the S4000 and SL202.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the FujiFilm S4000 to show more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The younger S4000 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79e81/79e81e5628d6cf18aa332f3f82fbe4c5f887cff4" alt="FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06e01/06e019fe5fdf342a782270d64823fd4c4716e0b1" alt="FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S4000 | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix S4000 | Samsung SL202 |
Also Known as | FinePix S4050 | PL50 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 540 grams (1.19 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery style | AA | - |
Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $279 | $140 |