FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB210
Portability
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
FujiFilm S4000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix S4050
Samsung WB210
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced July 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the FujiFilm S4000 and Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the S4000 (14MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S4000 was manufactured 6 months prior to the WB210 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S4000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the S4000 grades against the WB210 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S4000 and Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm S4000 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S4000 over the Samsung WB210
| S4000 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 1k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the FujiFilm S4000
| WB210 | S4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S4000 and Samsung WB210
| S4000 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | July 2011 | Same generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S4000 provides physical dimensions of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm S4000 and Samsung WB210 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the S4000 vs the WB210.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S4000 and WB210 is 67 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specifications. The pic underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S4000 and WB210.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of pictures however you may want to take the release date of the cameras into account.
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm S4000 Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB210 Portrait photography factors
megapixel count decent (14MP)
provides face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
manual focus
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
offers face detection focusing
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Street photography with FujiFilm S4000
Street photography with Samsung WB210
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than competition in class (540 grams)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has touch focus
lighter than others in class (174g)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
FujiFilm S4000 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB210 as a Sports photography camera
excellent zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
FujiFilm S4000 Travel photography factors
Samsung WB210 Travel photography factors
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long zoom (720mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (540g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
lighter than others in class (174g)
has touch focus
megapixel count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long reach (288mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with FujiFilm S4000
Landscape photography with Samsung WB210
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
big screen (3.5 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm S4000 Vlogging features
Samsung WB210 Vlogging features
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic port
heavier than competition in class (540g)
pretty wide (24mm)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
lighter than others in class (174 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic support
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S4000 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S4000 | Samsung WB210 |
| Also referred to as | FinePix S4050 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540 gr (1.19 lbs) | 174 gr (0.38 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $279 | $279 |
