FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB35F
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix S4050
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the S4000 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S4000 was brought out 4 years prior to the WB35F and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S4000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the S4000 scores against the WB35F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix S4000 & Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm S4000 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S4000 over the Samsung WB35F
| S4000 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the FujiFilm S4000
| WB35F | S4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 36 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the FujiFilm S4000 and Samsung WB35F
| S4000 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The FujiFilm S4000 features physical measurements of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the S4000 versus the WB35F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the S4000 and WB35F is 67 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the S4000 and WB35F.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB35F to resolve greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older S4000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm S4000 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S4000 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S4000 | Samsung WB35F |
| Alternate name | FinePix S4050 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540g (1.19 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $279 | $130 |
