FujiFilm T200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
FujiFilm T200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Announced January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm F800EXR
FujiFilm T200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the FujiFilm T200 versus Fujifilm F900EXR, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both manufactured by FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) is relatively well matched but the T200 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") use different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe T200 was revealed 3 years before the Fujifilm F900EXR which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the T200 matches up versus the Fujifilm F900EXR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
FujiFilm T200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
T200 | Fujifilm F900EXR |
---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the FujiFilm T200
Fujifilm F900EXR | T200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | January 2011 | Newer by 25 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Fujifilm F900EXR
T200 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm T200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The FujiFilm T200 comes with outside measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Fujifilm F900EXR has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm T200 versus Fujifilm F900EXR in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the T200 compared to the Fujifilm F900EXR.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the T200 and Fujifilm F900EXR is 94 and 90 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at a spec sheet. The image below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the T200 and Fujifilm F900EXR.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The T200 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Fujifilm F900EXR will resolve more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged T200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm T200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
FujiFilm T200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR |
Also called | FinePix T205 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | EXR II |
Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.60 m | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 151 grams (0.33 lb) | 232 grams (0.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 photographs | 260 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-45A | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $160 | $380 |