FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z915
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Launched January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the FujiFilm T200 versus Kodak Z915, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the T200 (14MP) and Z915 (10MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe T200 was launched 2 years after the Z915 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the T200 matches up vs the Z915 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Kodak EasyShare Z915. The complete galleries are provided at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Kodak Z915
| T200 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 25 months |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the FujiFilm T200
| Z915 | T200 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Kodak Z915
| T200 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm T200 features exterior dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z915 has measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm T200 versus Kodak Z915 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the T200 against the Z915.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the T200 and Z915 is 94 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The image below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the T200 and Z915.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the FujiFilm T200 to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The younger T200 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Other name | FinePix T205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151 grams (0.33 lb) | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $160 | $200 |