FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z950
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Launched June 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the FujiFilm T200 versus Kodak Z950, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is pretty similar and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe T200 was announced 7 months after the Z950 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the T200 scores versus the Z950 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The whole galleries are provided at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Kodak Z950
| T200 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the FujiFilm T200
| Z950 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Kodak Z950
| T200 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm T200 provides external measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Kodak Z950 has dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm T200 versus Kodak Z950 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the T200 compared to the Z950.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the T200 and Z950 is 94 and 89 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The image underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the T200 and Z950.
Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the FujiFilm T200 to deliver more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern T200 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Also called as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151g (0.33 lb) | 243g (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $160 | $250 |