FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
94 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released September 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the FujiFilm T200 and Kodak Easyshare M5370, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) is very close and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe T200 was brought out 8 months before the Easyshare M5370 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the T200 grades against the Easyshare M5370 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Kodak Easyshare M5370. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| T200 | Easyshare M5370 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the FujiFilm T200
| Easyshare M5370 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 | January 2011 | Newer by 8 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Kodak Easyshare M5370
| T200 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm T200 enjoys outer measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm T200 and Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the T200 vs the Easyshare M5370.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the T200 and Easyshare M5370 is 94 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by researching technical specs. The image here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the T200 and Easyshare M5370.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to provide you with more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged T200 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm T200 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2011-09-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-1, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151 grams (0.33 lb) | 150 grams (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $160 | $160 |