FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9700
94 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Launched February 2014
- Succeeded the Nikon S9500
- Updated by Nikon S9900
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9700 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9700, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Nikon. The image resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the S9700 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe T200 was brought out 4 years before the S9700 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the T200 matches up vs the S9700 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9700 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix T200 and Nikon Coolpix S9700. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm T200 Gallery and Nikon S9700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Nikon S9700
| T200 | S9700 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the FujiFilm T200
| S9700 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | January 2011 | Newer by 37 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Nikon S9700
| T200 | S9700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9700 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm T200 features exterior measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Nikon S9700 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9700 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the T200 against the S9700.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the T200 and S9700 is 94 and 90 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9700 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by going through a spec sheet. The picture here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the T200 and S9700.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Nikon S9700 to show greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged T200 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9700 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9700 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
| Also referred to as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-02-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 99 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151g (0.33 lbs) | 232g (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | 300 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $160 | $350 |