FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9900
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2015
- Replaced the Nikon S9700
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9900 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the S9900 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe T200 was revealed 5 years before the S9900 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the T200 matches up versus the S9900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix T200 and Nikon Coolpix S9900. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm T200 Gallery and Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Nikon S9900
| T200 | S9900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the FujiFilm T200
| S9900 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 49 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Nikon S9900
| T200 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm T200 has outside measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Nikon S9900 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9900 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the T200 and the S9900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the T200 and S9900 is 94 and 88 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the T200 and S9900.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Nikon S9900 to give extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older T200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm T200 vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
| Also Known as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151 grams (0.33 lb) | 289 grams (0.64 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $160 | $300 |