Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
55 Imaging
76 Features
82 Overall
78
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 204800
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Released February 2016
- Later Model is Pentax K-1 II
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and K-1 (36MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and K-1 (Full frame) possess different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 II was introduced 5 months before the K-1 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M10 II scores versus the K-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Pentax K-1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Pentax K-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Pentax K-1
E-M10 II | K-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Clearer screen (+3k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 over the Olympus E-M10 II
K-1 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax K-1
E-M10 II | K-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | February 2016 | Same generation | |
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys external dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Pentax K-1 has specifications of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 II against the K-1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and K-1 is 82 and 55 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out a spec sheet. The image here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and K-1.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Pentax K-1 will produce greater detail using its extra 20 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures much more aggressively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax K-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax K-1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2016-02-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 36 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7360 x 4912 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 204800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 33 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.2 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 4.4fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/200 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lbs) | 1010 gr (2.23 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | 96 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 14.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | 3280 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 760 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Card slots | Single | 2 |
Cost at release | $499 | $1,499 |