FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
94 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Later Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the FujiFilm T200 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe T200 was revealed 12 months after the SP-800 UZ so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the T200 scores against the SP-800 UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
| T200 | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | February 2010 | Newer by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the FujiFilm T200
| SP-800 UZ | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
| T200 | SP-800 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you should consider its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm T200 has exterior dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has proportions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm T200 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the T200 compared to the SP-800 UZ.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the T200 and SP-800 UZ is 94 and 69 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching specs. The image below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the T200 and SP-800 UZ.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you need to take the age of the cameras into account. The more recent T200 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
| Also called as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 143 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 12s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 pounds) | 455 gr (1.00 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $160 | $270 |