Clicky

FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus 9000

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33
FujiFilm FinePix T200 front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

FujiFilm T200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
  • 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2011
  • Alternate Name is FinePix T205
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Also Known as mju 9000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus 9000 Overview

Here is a extensive overview of the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The T200 was launched 21 months later than the 9000 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the T200 grades against the 9000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Olympus 9000

 T200 9000 
ReleasedJanuary 2011May 2009Fresher by 21 months

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the FujiFilm T200

 9000 T200 

Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus 9000

 T200 9000 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size2.7"2.7"Same screen measurement
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The FujiFilm T200 enjoys physical dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has sizing of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Analyze the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus 9000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the T200 compared to the 9000.

FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the T200 and 9000 is 94 and 92 respectively.

FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing specs. The photograph here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the T200 and 9000.

All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the FujiFilm T200 to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern T200 should have a benefit in sensor technology.

FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

FujiFilm T200 Portrait photography advice
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography advice
33
good resolution (14 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
21
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

FujiFilm T200 Street photography details
Olympus 9000 Street photography details
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than competition (225 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

FujiFilm T200 Sports photography factors
Olympus 9000 Sports photography factors
37
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
low frames per second (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (180 shots)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

FujiFilm T200 Travel photography advice
Olympus 9000 Travel photography advice
65
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
missing Timelapse function
terrible battery life (180 shots)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
58
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (225 grams)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

FujiFilm T200 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus 9000 Landscape photography highlights
36
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
terrible battery life (180 shots)
missing Timelapse function
32
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm T200 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus 9000 as a Vlogging camera
31
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
does not posses selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone support
27
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
heavier than competition (225g)
Photography Glossary

FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm T200 and Olympus 9000
 FujiFilm FinePix T200Olympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model type FujiFilm FinePix T200 Olympus Stylus 9000
Also called FinePix T205 mju 9000
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2011-01-05 2009-05-14
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 3200 -
Minimum native ISO 100 50
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.4-5.6 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing range 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 2.7"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 2.60 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 151 grams (0.33 lb) 225 grams (0.50 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-45A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD / SDHC xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $160 $300