Clicky

FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-310

Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
FujiFilm FinePix T200 front
 
Olympus TG-310 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35

FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs

FujiFilm T200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
  • 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2011
  • Additionally referred to as FinePix T205
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview

Below is a extended review of the FujiFilm T200 versus Olympus TG-310, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The T200 was released around the same time to the TG-310 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the T200 grades against the TG-310 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Olympus TG-310

          

          

            
 T200 TG-310 
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the FujiFilm T200

          

          

            
 TG-310 T200 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus TG-310

          

          

            
 T200 TG-310 
IntroducedJanuary 2011January 2011Similar age
Manual focus  Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal screen measurement
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen  Missing selfie screen
Touch screen  Neither features Touch screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm T200 enjoys external dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm T200 versus Olympus TG-310 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the T200 compared to the TG-310.
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the T200 and TG-310 is 94 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over specifications. The graphic below might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the T200 and TG-310.
To sum up, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution so you can expect similar quality of photos though you have to factor the launch date  of the products into consideration.

            FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Portrait photography information
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography information
33
 megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
 supports face detect focus
 focusing manually not possible
 manual mode not possible
 cannot use external flash
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
33
 good  resolution (14MP)
 supports face detect autofocus
 focusing manually not possible
 lack of manual mode
 no external flash support
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
Street photography with FujiFilm T200
Street photography with Olympus TG-310
57
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 screen is fixed
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
66
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather proof
 lighter than competition (155 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sports Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography highlights
37
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count decent (14MP)
 supports tracking focus
 max fps very slow (1.0 fps)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 bad battery pack (180 per charge)
 doesn't have phase detect auto focus
40
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (14MP)
 supports tracking focus
 weather proof
 slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 terrible battery (150 CIPA)
 no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Travel Comparison
 FujiFilm T200 as a Travel photography camera
 Olympus TG-310 as a Travel photography camera
65
 megapixel count decent (14MP)
 built-in flash
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 great zoom (280mm)
 does not have Timelapse function
 bad battery pack (180 CIPA)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
67
 lighter than competition (155g)
 weather proof
 good  resolution (14 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 relatively wide (28mm)
 lack of Timelapse recording
 terrible battery (150 shots)
 doesn't offer selfie friendly display
 slow max aperture (f3.9)
Photography Glossary
Landscape Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography factors
36
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
 focusing manually not possible
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
 screen is small (2.7 inches)
 manual mode not possible
 sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW format
 bad battery pack (180 CIPA)
 does not have Timelapse function
39
 relatively wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (14MP)
 weather proof
 focusing manually not possible
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.9)
 tiny screen (2.7 inch)
 lack of manual mode
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
 terrible battery (150 CIPA)
 lack of Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Vlogging Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Vlogging info
Olympus TG-310 Vlogging info
31
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports face detect focus
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
 does not have microphone port
32
 relatively wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports face detect autofocus
 lighter than competition (155 grams)
 slow max aperture (f3.9)
 doesn't offer selfie friendly display
 video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
 lack of microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
        
                
        

          

            
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm T200 and Olympus TG-310
 FujiFilm FinePix T200Olympus TG-310
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model FujiFilm FinePix T200 Olympus TG-310
Also referred to as FinePix T205 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Announced 2011-01-05 2011-01-06
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Highest boosted ISO 3200 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-280mm (10.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/3.4-5.6 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus range 5cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash range 2.60 m 4.20 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 151 grams (0.33 pounds) 155 grams (0.34 pounds)
Physical dimensions 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 pictures 150 pictures
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-45A LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD / SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $160 $0