FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-320
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
94 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
FujiFilm T200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix T205
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Let's look more closely at the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is relatively close and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe T200 was introduced 12 months earlier than the TG-320 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the T200 scores against the TG-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix T200 and Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm T200 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Olympus TG-320
| T200 | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the FujiFilm T200
| TG-320 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 12 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus TG-320
| T200 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The FujiFilm T200 has got physical dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus TG-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the T200 compared to the TG-320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the T200 and TG-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the T200 and TG-320.
Clearly, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP so you should expect comparable quality of pictures but you really should factor the release date of the cameras into account. The older T200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm T200 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
good MP (14MP)
features face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
MP count decent (14MP)
provides face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Street photography advice
Olympus TG-320 Street photography advice
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
lighter than competitors in class (155g)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
FujiFilm T200 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery (180 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
weather proofing
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery power (150 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography factors
good MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
no Timelapse function
terrible battery (180 shots)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
lighter than competitors in class (155 grams)
weather proofing
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
bad battery power (150 CIPA)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with FujiFilm T200
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-320
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
terrible battery (180 CIPA)
no Timelapse function
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
bad battery power (150 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm T200 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Vlogging camera
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone jack
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
lighter than competitors in class (155g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Also Known as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 pounds) | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | 150 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $160 | $0 |