FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-4
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
FujiFilm T200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix T205
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-3
- Replacement is Olympus TG-5
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Below is a in-depth review of the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe T200 was announced 5 years earlier than the TG-4 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a brief overview of how the T200 grades vs the TG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix T200 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T200 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Olympus TG-4
| T200 | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the FujiFilm T200
| TG-4 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2015 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 51 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus TG-4
| T200 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The FujiFilm T200 provides outside dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus TG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the T200 vs the TG-4.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the T200 and TG-4 is 94 and 90 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to see the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the T200 and TG-4.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-4 to produce more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older T200 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography advice
resolution is good (14MP)
features face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
focusing manually
decent MP (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Street photography information
Olympus TG-4 Street photography information
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors in class (247g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Sports photography information
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography information
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
max fps very slow (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery (180 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
better than average battery life (380 shots)
slow frames per second (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Travel photography with FujiFilm T200
Travel photography with Olympus TG-4
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very long zoom (280mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
terrible battery (180 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
better than average battery life (380 CIPA)
environment sealing
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competitors in class (247g)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm T200 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Landscape photography camera
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual mode not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
terrible battery (180 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse mode
focusing manually
really wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
better than average battery life (380 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm T200 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Vlogging camera
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focusing
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
really wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no microphone port
more heavy than competitors in class (247g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Also Known as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151 grams (0.33 pounds) | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | 380 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $160 | $379 |