FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VH-410
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Portability
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
FujiFilm T200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix T205
Olympus VH-410
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus VH-410, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the VH-410 (16MP) is fairly close and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe T200 was launched 19 months earlier than the VH-410 making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the T200 grades versus the VH-410 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Olympus VH-410. The complete galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Olympus VH-410
| T200 | VH-410 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the FujiFilm T200
| VH-410 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 19 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus VH-410
| T200 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The FujiFilm T200 comes with outer measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-410 has sizing of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus VH-410 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the T200 against the VH-410.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the T200 and VH-410 is 94 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the T200 and VH-410.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus VH-410 to result in more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged T200 will be behind in sensor technology.
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus VH-410 Portrait photography highlights
decent megapixels (14MP)
offers face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
supports face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Street photography with FujiFilm T200
Street photography with Olympus VH-410
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports focus by touch
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Sports photography info
Olympus VH-410 Sports photography info
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery power (180 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Travel photography highlights
Olympus VH-410 Travel photography highlights
decent megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
bad battery power (180 shots)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
supports focus by touch
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with FujiFilm T200
Landscape photography with Olympus VH-410
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
bad battery power (180 shots)
lack of Timelapse mode
quite wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Vlogging details
Olympus VH-410 Vlogging details
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone jack
quite wide (26mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Olympus VH-410 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Olympus VH-410 |
| Also Known as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2012-08-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 lb) | 152 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $160 | $186 |