FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-320
94 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the FujiFilm T200 versus Olympus VR-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very close and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe T200 was revealed 6 months earlier than the VR-320 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the T200 scores versus the VR-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix T200 and Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T200 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Olympus VR-320
| T200 | VR-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the FujiFilm T200
| VR-320 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus VR-320
| T200 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 | July 2011 | Same generation | |
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm T200 features physical measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm T200 versus Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the T200 versus the VR-320.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the T200 and VR-320 is 94 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing specs. The pic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the T200 and VR-320.
All in all, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of images although you should always factor the release date of the cameras into account.
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Also referred to as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $160 | $179 |