FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
![FujiFilm FinePix T200 front FujiFilm FinePix T200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-T200/FujiFilm-T200-front.jpg)
![Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VR-340/Olympus-VR-340-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Here is a in-depth comparison of the FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is very comparable and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The T200 was manufactured 12 months prior to the VR-340 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the T200 scores against the VR-340 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Olympus VR-340. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Olympus VR-340
T200 | VR-340 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the FujiFilm T200
VR-340 | T200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 12 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus VR-340
T200 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm T200 offers external measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-340 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the T200 vs the VR-340.
![FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-T200-vs-Olympus-VR-340-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the T200 and VR-340 is 94 and 96 respectively.
![FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-T200-vs-Olympus-VR-340-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the T200 and VR-340.
As you can see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-340 to show more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older T200 will be behind in sensor tech.
![FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-T200-vs-Olympus-VR-340-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-T200-vs-Olympus-VR-340-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Olympus VR-340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Olympus VR-340 |
Also called as | FinePix T205 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.0-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.60 m | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 151 gr (0.33 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-45A | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $160 | $130 |