FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
FujiFilm T200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix T205
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Here is a in-depth comparison of the FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is very comparable and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe T200 was manufactured 12 months prior to the VR-340 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the T200 scores against the VR-340 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Olympus VR-340. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Olympus VR-340
| T200 | VR-340 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the FujiFilm T200
| VR-340 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 12 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Olympus VR-340
| T200 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm T200 offers external measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-340 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the T200 vs the VR-340.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the T200 and VR-340 is 94 and 96 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the T200 and VR-340.
As you can see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-340 to show more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older T200 will be behind in sensor tech.
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography highlights
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Street photography details
Olympus VR-340 Street photography details
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (125 grams)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Sports photography factors
Olympus VR-340 Sports photography factors
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
supports tracking focus
max frames per second low (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (180 CIPA)
has no phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Travel photography features
Olympus VR-340 Travel photography features
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
long zoom (280mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
terrible battery pack (180 shots)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
lighter than others (125 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
missing Timelapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm T200 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Landscape photography camera
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not available
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
terrible battery pack (180 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse mode
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Vlogging advice
Olympus VR-340 Vlogging advice
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic port
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
lighter than others (125 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm T200 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Also called as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $160 | $130 |