FujiFilm T200 vs Panasonic ZS35
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
94 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Portability
89 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
89 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
FujiFilm T200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
FujiFilm T200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix T205
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS30
- Updated by Panasonic ZS40
Photography Glossary FujiFilm T200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the FujiFilm T200 versus Panasonic ZS35, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Panasonic. The image resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is pretty close and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe T200 was released 4 years before the ZS35 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the T200 grades vs the ZS35 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm T200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The complete galleries are provided at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Panasonic ZS35
| T200 | ZS35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the FujiFilm T200
| ZS35 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 36 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Panasonic ZS35
| T200 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm T200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm T200 features external dimensions of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS35 has dimensions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm T200 versus Panasonic ZS35 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the T200 vs the ZS35.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the T200 and ZS35 is 94 and 89 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing specs. The graphic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the T200 and ZS35.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Panasonic ZS35 to provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older T200 will be behind in sensor tech.
FujiFilm T200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with FujiFilm T200
Portrait photography with Panasonic ZS35
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
features face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Street photography with FujiFilm T200
Street photography with Panasonic ZS35
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (305g)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
FujiFilm T200 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Sports photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery power (180 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Travel photography information
Panasonic ZS35 Travel photography information
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
very long zoom (280mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
bad battery power (180 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
lighter than competitors in class (305g)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (480mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with FujiFilm T200
Landscape photography with Panasonic ZS35
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
bad battery power (180 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse function
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm T200 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Vlogging camera
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic jack
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (305 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
lack of external mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm T200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix T205 | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 21 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151 grams (0.33 lbs) | 305 grams (0.67 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $160 | $300 |